Internet Information Society
Battling Islam with Information
Will it work?
January 9, 2006
Only a fool would argue that America is not at the forefront of a free world utilizing tools of free expression. News and information are spread in seconds across the world for almost all to see. Some view this with alarm. For example, the mainstream media is very concerned about its future when purveyors of truth not only steal the news from the news monopoly, but also expose the monopoly for blatant propaganda and misinformation (think "Rathergate"). Others use the occasion of free speech to sue it to silence.
While our own US media sides with the muslims, rational thinking Americans skirt the media and use the internet to spread the truth the media so casually buries. But to what end? Can information defeat our enemies?
There are somewhere over 100 wars going on every year - sometimes more, sometimes less. For as long as man has existed, war has followed, and in quantity. Can anyone guess what the common factor in every single war has been? This is really an absolute softball pitch that everyone should hit: killing. Every single war has involved blood and death.
In this current struggle against Islam where the muslims believe it is their Allah-commanded duty to kill westerners in jihad, muslims are killing and beheading and blowing up innocent people. Even Americans here in America.
I dare anyone to email me a single war in the entire 6,000 year recorded history of man where the war was bloodless and won with information.
Was the US South beat with information? Was the Kaiser beat with information? Were the Barbary islamic terrorists beat with information? Was Hitler beat with information? Was King George beat with information? Was Saddam beat with information?
I certainly cannot belittle the spread of information as an effective tool. The truth, known by many, will triumph over lies. However, information is but one weapon in an arsenal. With truth, we can name the enemy (Islam). With truth, we can identify the targets that need to be hit to destroy the other guy's warmaking potential (the states and people that support Islam).
However, the time must come when the information is used by those warriors who will kill those muslims who are so gleefully killing us with the media's wink and nod. In war, there is no room for "concern" over the enemy's civil rights. There is no room for "sensitivity" to the feelings of the enemy. There is no room for "understanding" with welcome arms the suicidal murders of the muslim bombers. There is no room for "respecting" a religion that calls for murder of unbelievers (compare that with the total disrespect the US media has for Christianity with its "do unto others as you would have them do unto you" rule).
Information will not be the crucifix that stops the Islamic vampire from killing over and over again. Even in that silly metaphor, the crucifix never kills the vampire - only makes it pause. It takes the violent driving of a stake through the heart of the vampire - an act of extreme violence. Likewise, showing a muslim beheader a website of information will not make the murderer suddenly die or stop what he's doing. Only a killing act will stop such a murderer. Information being a tool cannot "win" the war, just as a combat boot being a tool of war cannot win the war, either.
I have seen many conservatives claim that we cannot engage in war with Islam because there is a billion muslims in the world. If there were a billion nazis at war with us, would we use the same excuse? If China declared war, would we use the same excuse? What do numbers have to do with whether we can fight a war against an enemy who declared war on us? Many will say that Islam did not declare war on us, which is silly. Islam has been at war with us since 630AD at the Battle of Tabouk. Islamic writings since then have described the West as the lands of jihad.
"To Muslims, all Muslims, the whole world is classified in two parts: that part of the world which has submitted, and is therefore in the Islamic state, known as Dar al Islam, and that part of the world which has yet to submit, and is therefore in a pre-Islamic, chaotic, jahiliyyic state, known as Dar al Harb, or the House of War! The House of War is the part of the world which has yet to be taken over, and must at some point be taken over in the future." ( - the inestimable Mark Alexander) Click the link and read it, then compare it to almost every single Islamic media utterance for the last several years as noted here.
Many conservatives and almost all liberals claim that not all muslims are terrorists. This quaint little saying ignores the strictures of the Qur'an. Never, anywhere, was there a massive public outcry of rejection from muslims over 9/11. Another quaint saying that carries more reality than the silly one above would be: There are two kinds of muslims. Those that murder and those that don't condemn it. The only people talking about "moderate" Islam are the "infidels" who are strenuously trying to paste a reasonable face to a murder-cult religion.
A muslim cannot live "moderately" as a peaceful co-habitant as we in the west think that all can and must in a free society. A muslim is expected to follow the Islamic plan. Note the following:
This is the duty of every individual Muslim living within a non-Muslim political entity. They should set up mosques, community centres and Islamic schools. At all costs they must avoid being assimilated by the majority. In order to resist assimilation, they must group themselves geographically, forming areas of high Muslim concentration within the population as a whole. Yet they must also interact with non-Muslims so as to share the message of Islam with them. Every Muslim individual is required to participate in the plan; it is not allowed for anyone simply to live as a “good Muslim” without assisting the overall strategy. The ultimate goal of this strategy is that the Muslims should become a majority and the entire nation be governed according to Islam.
(M. Ali Kettani “The Problems of Muslim Minorities and their Solutions” in Muslim Communities in Non-Muslim States (London: Islamic Council of Europe, 1980) pp.96-105 )
Therefore, my own little quaint saying that the majority of Americans reject relies on the truth, not secular well-wishes. Show me a muslim that rejects murder and jihad and I'll show you someone who isn't a muslim.
The Islamic plan is to take over America from the inside. Islam is the enemy. Should we be giving voting "rights" to an enemy? Our liberal left imprisoned the Japanese, Italians and Germans in camps during World War II. Yet we cannot do the same to muslims who have stated over and over that they will conquer America? Islam is a disease; you do not embrace diseases. Islam is all about murder and oppression; you do not win against a murderer with information.
Once the truth is spread, the enemy will need to be removed from American soil or eventually killed in defense. There is no other way around the war that Islam is waging against the West. The results of giving up are beyond horrifying. We cannot just ignore Islam and hope it will go away. We cannot impress Islam with our secular "values" (they hate our secularism). We will never be successful trying to "include" Islam out of respect - in Islam, there is no room for co-habitation unless Islam reigns supreme and all are under sharia law.
Just because we have lived over two hundred years in safety in America does not mean that this nation will last forever if we refuse to face threats. Being complacent is exactly what muslims want us to be. It insures their victory. The longer we delay and stall, the bloodier and messier the war will be.
To win:
+ We must remove Islam from America. There is no room for a political murder cult that wants to destroy the constitution and replace it with sharia law.
+ We must remove/tear down all of the mosques from American soil. Islam does not allow the building of Christian churches on its soil, anywhere. Islam is about spreading, not accomodating.
+ We must be prepared to kill many, many muslims for the rest of our lives, for they will surely continue the jihad against us.
Note: Many say that terrorism is a recent convention. It is not. Islamic terror has been ongoing, non-stop since 630AD. Only recently, in this last century, have petro-dollars funded the purchase of weapons and the building of hate-mosques at a greatly accelerated pace. Islamic murder is nothing new - just ask the citizens of India who have lost millions to centuries of "peaceful" Islamic murder.
We will not win by impressing the muslims. We will not win by spreading information. We will not win by talking. No one likes war, but this war was declared on us by murderers. Either we fight, or we lose.
“When the sacred months are past, kill those who join other gods wherever you find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them with every kind of ambush; but if they convert and observe prayer and pay the obligatory alms, let them go their way.” (Koran 9:5)
"When you meet the unbelievers in the battlefield strike off their heads." (Sura 47, Verse 4)
There are NO civilians in Islamic law - all non-believers are combatants: See HERE.
"INACTIVITY IS DEATH" - Benito Mussolini