National Socialists

Whacko Leftist Liberal Scum...

Libs sure loved Hitler's Beetle.

This is a subject dear to me - not because I admire the nazis, but rather because I am a WW2 buff. Unfortunately for "the liberal establishment," I am also a political buff. Without thinking about that, one might think, "so what?" Oh no, that is a very noxious mix to liberals, and you'll soon see why.

There are two excellent books that are first and foremost on my list of pertinent books to read about nazis. First is MEIN KAMPF by the little moustache, himself, Adolf Hitler. You can find it here, online. Nothing means more than his very own words. If you read it, you will be amazed to find it doesn't match what you have been told over the years, except that it is racist. The prevalent over-usage of the words "bourgeois," "class struggle," and "proletariat" are right out of your friendly leftist handbook.

The second book is unfortunately not online, but so immensely instructive as to the philosophical underpinnings of the National Socialist Labor Party and current trends in America, that I would strongly promote its purchase by anyone. OMINOUS PARALLELS by Leonard Peikoff which can be bought here.

So why a section on nazis? Good question, and loaded. The reason there is a section on nazis on my website has to do with the "whitewash" the current century is giving such a horrific historic event. WE ARE BEING LIED TO, over and over and over again until we get it drummed into our heads and we begin to believe... The propoganda we are currently undergoing (and mostly complete now) is better than any nazi propoganda Goebbels could have spewed. And what is it? That nazis were "right wing." We have been told since the mid 70s that Hitler was a conservative. We have been told that nazis were what nasty, evil republicans hid in their closets. The entire horror of nazi history has been blamed on "the right."

But it's not the truth.

If you are inclined to study history (and I don't mean a worthless school textbook), then I can dispense with excruciating details and simply mention pertinent facts as to the history of the nazis. Germany of the late 1800s and up into the early 1930s was moving solidly towards Marxism. Despite having a conservative monarchy and federal republic, the idea of Marxism had won over the people and politicians. Hitler stepped into the political scene with his racism and "saved" Germany from communism, basically. He was able to create an enemy out of the Jews and Marxism by marrying the two culprits together. His assumption to power was a gift from the conservative government as a way to appeal to the socialist following Hitler was building.

Make absolutely no mistake about national socialists. They are socialists. The only difference between national socialists and marxists is the retention of private property under the former. Hitler did not fabricate the title "National Socialist German Workers Party" just for kicks. Hitler was obsessed with the power of the state to direct, control, and guide the people as subjects of the state. In fact, let's quote the dictator.

HITLER SAID: "I have learned a great deal from Marxism, and I do not hesitate to admit, that the difference between them and myself is that I have really put into practice what these peddlars and penpushers have timidly begin... National Socialism is what Marxism might have been if it could have broken its absurd and artificial ties with a democratic order." <Preussentum und Sozialismus>

As to the philosophical aspects of naziism and where it fits into the political spectrum, if you read my page in here on liberals, you will find the following familiar: PLATO philosophically equated virtue as man selflessly contributing to the unity of the whole society. Reason was deemed mutable so that individuals would not benefit through absolutes (right vs wrong). Society deemed right and wrong as it saw the need to advance the whole. Plato is the root of modern-day socialism. More on that in a minute. ARISTOTLE philosophically equated virtue with the pursuit of self and reason. Aristotle acknowledged rights and wrongs as being immutable. Reason was deemed the key to individual advancement. Aristotle was the father of the scientific explosion and age of enlightenment.  From these 2 major philosophers, western thought developed. Kant, the German philosopher, was a direct adherent to Platonic philosophy. He carried it a step further. Individuals had an obligation to sacrifice for the society as a whole, a duty to suppress the self to the aims of the nation.

Hitler and his fellows of National Socialism simply gave the final conection between philosophers. The will of the people (society as per Plato) was expressed as right or wrong (as per Kant) as the leader (the voice as per Hitler) saw fit. There is nothing difficult here. Socialism is the antithesis of individual freedom. Left wing politics pursues the expression of society as a whole. Right wing politics expresses the total freedom of the individual.

To sum my brief of political history: Nazis were LEFT wing. Nazis belong in the LIBERAL closet.

Many people I have talked to exhibit almost no intellectual capacity to reason when it comes to Hitler. They claim he was a fascist and fascist means "right wing." But they're being ignorant.

I could claim that the sky is green over and over and over again and get a few other people to repeat it with me over and over and over again - but that doesn't make the sky green, does it?

FASCISM is not a bad thing. The root of the word comes from fasces, which is the symbol of the Roman Empire - a bundle of sticks surrounding an axe. There is no evil connotation to the word. Fascism can be applied to almost any government, but almost always liberal. Fascism is nothing more than a strong state with power residing in one individual. Stalin was a fascist communist. Hitler was a fascist socialist. Mussolini was a fascist centrist - not exactly liberal and not exactly conservative, but more right wing than not. Nothing about fascism speaks of racism, murder, or evil. It is a description of governmental power. It is neither liberal nor conservative.

"But but but... Hitler wore a uniform! So he has to be right wing!" I've heard that one, too. It's a load of poop. John Kerry and JFK wore a uniform and that didn't make them "right wing." Stalin wore a uniform, too, and he was as left wing as you could get. Think for a minute, too. The prussian (former) aristocracy that comprised the Wehrmacht, the CONSERVATIVE element, tried to assassinate Hitler.

Hitler was not right wing. He was a radical, militant LEFT WING leader of a bunch of socialists. I'll take some time here to expand and cover all the political aspects of naziism using their domestic policies.

The following aims of the National Socialist Party in Germany can be easily compared to American liberals. I'll go point-by-point.

*THE ACTIVITIES OF THE INDIVIDUAL MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO CLASH WITH THE INTERESTS OF THE COMMUNITY, BUT MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN ITS CONFINES AND BE  FOR THE GOOD OF ALL ... Another definition of "political correctness," the biggest liberal fad to hit America.

 *WE DEMAND THE NATIONALIZATION OF ALL BUSINESSES WHICH HAVE BEEN AMALGAMATED (INTO TRUSTS).  Remember Hillary trying to nationalize the health industry? The entire airline security apparatus was nationalized after 9/11 at the demands of liberals like Ted Kennedy.

 *WE DEMAND THAT THE STATE SHALL SHARE IN THE PFOFITS OF LARGE INDUSTRIES.  Liberals are also doing this - think of the Tobacco settlement. That suit was vigorously pursued by American liberals. Every large American business sector is under threat from nanny-liberals. Think about the assault on "big food" for fat content, big automakers for SUVs, big oil for environmental issues, and all the many cases of trial lawyers hitting big business for excessive awards. Trial settlements result in profit-taking by people who don't own the stock. Liberal politicians consistently defend intrusive and abusive trial lawyers and the system that allows it.

 *WE DEMAND THAT PROVISION FOR THE AGED SHALL BE MADE ON A VERY GREATLY INCREASED SCALE.  Nationalization of old folks homes. Note how many media programs talk about how awful private homes are and how the government needs to play a bigger role in caring for the elderly. Only liberal politicians champion this idea.

 *WE DEMAND A LAND-REFORM SUITABLE TO OUR NATIONAL REQUIREMENTS, THE PASSING OF A LAW FOR THE CONFISCATION OF LAND FOR COMMUNAL PURPOSES; THE ABOLITION OF INTEREST ON MORTGAGES, AND PROHIBITION OF ALL SPECULATION IN LAND.  Liberals authored and passed the eminent domain laws that are now accounting for the illegal confiscation of private property by local, state, and federal governments.

 *WE DEMAND AN AGRARIAN REFORM SUITABLE TO OUR NATIONAL REQUIREMENTS; THE ENACTMENT OF A LAW TO EXPROPRIATE WITHOUT COMPENSATION THE OWNERS OF ANY LAND THAT MAY BE NEEDED FOR NATIONAL PURPOSES; THE ABOLITION OF GROUND RENTS; AND THE PROHIBITION OF ALL SPECULATION IN LAND.  Nationalization of farms... no liberal has tried this yet, but American liberal farm policies are statist in nature (price supports/controls, federal subsidies via federal purchases, central planning on usage of acreage, etc.).

 *...THE STATE SHALL ORGANIZE THOROUGHLY THE WHOLE CULTURAL SYSTEM OF THE NATION . . . THE CONCEPTION OF THE STATE IDEA (THE SCIENCE OF CITIZENSHIP) SHALL BE TAUGHT IN THE SCHOOLS FROM THE VERY BEGINNING.  WE DEMAND THAT SPECIALLY TALENTED CHILDREN OF POOR PARENTS, NO MATTER WHAT THEIR STATION OR OCCUPATION, SHALL BE EDUCATED AT THE COST OF THE STATE.  Nothing is more predictable than a liberal claiming we don't spend enough on education. However, the facts tell a different story. Some can be found HERE. The news is filled with stories of liberals pushing their agenda on our school children. Back in the late 1970's, our history teacher was tasked with teaching us Political Correctness (liberal thought-control). It continues to this day as I hear it from my children. PC is an attempt to alter thinking as a cultural issue - something the nazis did as well.

 *IT IS THE DUTY OF THE STATE TO HELP RAISE THE STANDARD OF THE NATION'S HEALTH BY PROVIDING MATERNITY WELFARE CENTRES, BY PROHIBITING JUVENILE LABOUR, BY INCREASING PHYSICAL FITNESS THROUGH THE INTRODUCTION OF COMPULSORY GAMES AND GYMNASTICS. . . .  There's nothing like an American liberal telling you that you don't know how to take care of yourself (with the accompanying insinuation that you're too stupid to know) and informing you that you need a new government program to take care of you.

* (WE) COMBAT THE MATERIALISTIC SPIRIT WITHIN AND OUTSIDE US, AND ARE CONVINCED THAT A PERMANENT RECOVERY OF OUR PEOPLE CAN ONLY PROCEED WITHIN ON THE FOUNDATION OF "THE COMMON GOOD BEFORE THE INDIVIDUAL GOOD."  Ever listen to the liberals harangue us over and over about "greed?" Barbra Streisand can charge $1500.00 per ticket for her "concerts," then she berates us about how greedy the conservatives are and that the country would be better off if we could get rid of the republicans? Hell, just take a quick search of DANNY GLOVER'S comments to see how liberals view America - the exact same way the nazis viewed their country. What do Hollywood liberals say about "greed?" Try THIS and THIS and THIS for starters.

                         RED demands taken -- From the "Twenty-Five Point" Programme of the German National Socialist Workers Party, authored by Adolf Hitler and others on February 24, 1920. (Konrad Heiden's translation in A History of National Socialism)

Hitler's policies were regaled early on by American liberals as in their camp, as can be noted here, but the historical revisionism today is almost complete. Read through any number of political assessments that claim Hitler was "right wing" and you'll see the glaring contradictions. You just have to be aware to look for them.

Hitler's background and goals were entirely socialist. His domestic policies, once in power, centered around price controls, central planning, expanded government welfare and government work programs, nationalized health care, pay equalization, etc. - ALL liberal platforms. Note details of all that HERE.

Hitler was also a diehard GREEN. He was obsessed with a national plan for the health of his people via eugenics (the breeding of healthy people). The nazis used abortion and euthanasia to kill any baby or child deemed to be retarded, malformed or different. American liberals and institutions push this eugenics today with their constant advocation of abortion for any and every reason, but especially for the purposes of getting rid of retarded kids. Quoting from that last link: Children in the womb are being killed just weeks before birth for the sin of being a dwarf, for instance, and famed animal rights philosopher Peter Singer wants parents free to kill deformed children in their first month of life. Meanwhile support for euthanasia for the sick, tired or incompetent grows. Hitler also banned medical experiments on animals, but just not Jewish children. American liberals want to ban animal experiments, but want to use aborted babies for experiments. Sound similar? Nazis were also very concerned with the growing extinction of species, the destruction of forests, the genocide of aboriginal peoples, the disruption of the ecosystem and the killing of whales. Still don't sound familiar? Hint: American Liberals believe the same thing as Hitler because they're both from the same side of the political aisle!

Mussolini got the short end of all the sticks - he was a good leader, effective, and rooted out the rampant governmental corruption that had plagued Italy. He was also the darling of America in the 20s and 30s. Historical revisionism has lumped him in the same uncomplimentary box as his ally Germany. You can read between the lines on this piece and see how Mussolini actually helped Italy emerge into the modern era.

I believe in TRUTH. I do not care for the idea that TRUTH can be changed to fit whatever society wants it to be. It might make the liberals "feel good" to claim that Hitler was right wing, but the TRUTH is that he was a solid, radical, leftist.

Return to the Index